Singapore face two years of fairly deep recession Asia's real economy is hit by the rout in financial markets, the worst since the Great Depression of the 1930s, analysts said Singapore's central bank may further ease policy in the next six months because the economic contraction may spill into next year.Singapore' economy shrank an annualised, seasonally adjusted 6.3 percent in the July-September quarter, advance estimates showed, compared with forecast growth of 1.1 percent. The economy shrank 5.7 percent in the second quarter.From a year earlier, the economy contracted 0.5 percent as exports and manufacturing slumped.The Southeast Asian nation last sank into a recession -- usually defined as two consecutive quarters of economic contractions -- in 2002 in a global downturn after the Sept. 11, 2001 attack."The outlook for next year is very dodgy. Singapore might face two years of fairly deep recession as it is a small, open economy," said Song Seng Wun, an economist at CIMB.The government also revised down its 2008 growth forecast for the third time this year to around 3 percent on Friday from an earlier estimate of 4 to 5 percent. They mucked up the economy and blame everything and everyone but themselves Singapore President's Basic Salary raised to S$3,187,100 (24.9% increase), Singapore's current President, Nathan, was a member of the dreaded Japanese Kampeti (uniform, sword and all) during the Japanese occupation of Singapore.Singapore Prime Minister's Basic Salary raised to S$3,091,200 (25.5% increase). This is US$2.04 million, or about five times more than U.S. President George W. Bush, who currently takes home US$400,000 Senior Minister – S$3,043,300 (13.5% increase) or US$2.01 million. Minister Mentor – S$3,043,300 (13.5% increase) or US$2.01 millionDeputy Prime Minister – S$2,452,500 (18.8% increase) US$1.62 million.Minister and Senior Perm Sec – S$1,593,500 (32.5% increase) or US$1.06 million]Entry Superscale Grade – S$384,000 (3.3% increase) Member of Parliament – S$216,300 (23.2% increase)Average Singaporean: US$26,000 (S$43,104 or S$3,592 per mo) Source: Singapore Ministry of ManpowerThe poorest 10% in Singapore earn S$3,600, or S$300 a month.Welfare payments to the needy S$290 a month. Can downgrade your pigeonhole, right? Later got money then upgrade again loh? *hee*hee* It could have been worse...*hee*hee* Thousand unhappy Peasants gathered at Speakers' Corner Saturday evening More videos and pictures: URLI must state that I only support peasants aggrieved by irresponsible adverts and lured by lucrative investment offers and misled into losses with naive mindsets, to voice up against these financial institutions, and bring awareness to public.I am not supportive to calls for using public funds to bail-out any losses. I think this is most unfair because these losses are incurred by those who stood for financial gain with risks, this is their own gamble and their own consequences. They got gains and losses this is what they went in for. The public does not - not at all share their gains, and therefore should not be sharing their losses. These gamblers are not much more different from Casino gamblers, when they win they enjoy their profits without sharing with the public at all, they earned vacations; new cars; new houses etc all for themselves and not the public. When they lost no public funds should be abused to bail them out, they must learn from their own lessons and face their own consequences just as how they enjoyed their gains.Public funds should not be used to bail out stock losers, just as public funds are not to be abused to bail out casino losers. Not even in the name of saving the economy. The member of public who did not took part in these gamble stand to gain nothing, and thus should not lose anything on behalf of these greed driven losers. The more you rescue these losers the more emboldened they got to take risk on behalf of the public, and the less they will learn from their lessons.By the law of nature the losers are supposed to bear the consequences themselves without affecting other innocents who did not made any decision to take risk. Government should hold these innocent members of public entirely harmless instead of abusing funds from these innocent members of public to cover losses made by some who on their own decisions took risks to stand for personal gains without any benefit to the public.When Temasek GIC made their huge losses it is already bonded unfairly by Singaporean tax payers, why must tax payers still further bear losses beyond the incompetence of famiLEE LEEgime / Temasek GIC?Tax payers should stand up NOW and refuse to be suckers all the way! Singapore becomes the first Asian victim of recession AFP, SINGAPORESaturday, Oct 11, 2008, Page 1Singapore has become the first Asian economy to fall into recession, analysts said yesterday, after the government revised downward its full-year growth estimate and eased monetary policy for the first time in years.The Ministry of Trade and Industry lowered the city-state’s full-year growth forecast to around 3 percent, citing a slowdown in the global economy and key domestic sectors.The move came as the ministry released preliminary data showing that real GDP declined by 6.3 percent in the third quarter after contracting 5.7 percent in the previous quarter, the ministry said.While it did not describe the economy as being in recession, a technical recession is generally defined as two consecutive quarters of contraction in economic output.“Singapore will be the first Asia economy to fall into a technical recession,” DBS Group Research said in an assessment of the data.In a move to confront the downturn, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) — its de facto central bank — said it was easing monetary policy for the first time in more than four years.“The Singapore economy has weakened over the course of 2008, alongside an escalation in the turmoil in financial markets and a more severe deceleration in global economic activity,” MAS said.These developments meant new uncertainties for the Singapore economy, while slower Asian growth would restrain activity in a range of service industries such as transportation and tourism, it said.“The risks to external demand conditions continue to be on the downside and a more severe global downturn cannot be discounted,” the bank said.Singapore is Southeast Asia’s wealthiest economy in terms of GDP per capita, but is heavily dependent on trade. This makes it sensitive to hiccups in developed economies, particularly key export markets the US and Europe.Economists polled by Dow Jones Newswires had forecast a 0.3 percent quarter-on-quarter rise in GDP, the value of goods and services produced in the economy.Compared with the third quarter of last year, the ministry said Singapore’s economy contracted by 0.5 percent in real terms, against the 0.8 percent expansion foreseen in the Dow Jones poll. JBJ death: The Straits Times website described Mr Jeyaretnam as "pugnacious", an "old warhorse" and "irrelevant" JBJ died of heart failure aged 82Veteran Singapore politician JB Jeyaretnam has died of heart failure in a Singapore hospital, aged 82.He was the first to break a government monopoly on power in Singapore when he won a seat in parliament in 1981.He had been forced into bankruptcy over defamation cases won by the government but was planning a new run for office.Dubbed the Grand Old Man of opposition politics, analysts said Mr Jeyaretnam was a thorn in the side of Singapore's Minister Mentor Lee Kuan-yew.Born in 1926 in Jaffna, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), Mr Jeyaretnam trained as a lawyer in Britain before making his home in Singapore.Political injusticesHe served as an MP from 1981 to 1986 and from 1997 to 2001.His first victory, as standard bearer for the Workers' Party, came when he defeated the People's Action Party (PAP) of founding prime minister of independent Singapore Mr Lee.He was returned to parliament in 1984 but in 1986 was found guilty of making a false declaration of his party's accounts and fined a sum which made him liable to expulsion from the legislature.He was disqualified from sitting in parliament until 1991, and disbarred from legal practice.The Privy Council in Britain ruled in 1988 that he had been wrongly disbarred in "a grievous injustice".Mr Lee "appeared determined to drive him from political life" wrote Professor Michael Leifer in his Dictionary of the Modern Politics of Southeast Asia.Not until 1997 did Mr Jeyaretnam try again; he re-entered parliament as a non-constituency member without voting rights.Just over a year later he was again brought to court, on the charge of having defamed then prime minister Goh Chok-tong and ten other senior members of the PAP.Although the court found in favour of the government it awarded damages at only one-tenth of the amount possible but on appeal, damages were increased and full costs imposed on Mr Jeyaretnam.By May 2000, he was declared bankrupt for failing to keep up payments in another libel case.He left the Workers' Party in 2001, and was discharged from bankruptcy in 2007.Re-election plansThis year he helped form the Reform Party to challenge the 40-year rule of Singapore by the PAP, saying Singapore had been "enslaved" by its rulers.He said in April he planned to run in the next parliament election, due by 2011.His death came just days before he was to appear in the High Court to seek an order that a by-election be held for a seat that is currently vacant, his family told AFP news agency.GK Pamela, another of his relatives, said Mr Jeyaretnam hoped he would be propelled back into parliament."That was his wish," she told AFP in tears. "Such a good man. Why did God take him?"The opposition has long been marginalised in Singapore, where it complains of limited access to the pro-government mainstream media and restrictions on public assemblies.The People's Action Party, which has ruled Singapore since independence from Malaysia in 1965, holds 82 out of 84 elected seats in Parliament.The Straits Times website described Mr Jeyaretnam as "pugnacious", an "old warhorse" and "irrelevant". PAP's neglect of Singapore's poor is a shame Gopalan Nair assulted by Singapore Police! Police cause injuries seen on Mr. Gopalan's face taken on Saturday night (5.July.2008).Police cause distorted and twisted eye classes of Mr. Gopalan taken on Saturday night (5.July.2008). Dr. Chee: We want justice, the rule of law Dr Chee:"What I'm interested in is justice, the rule of law, because ultimately it is not about you, Mr. Lee. It is not about me. It's about the people of Singapore, it is about this country and everything we stand for. You and I will pass on, but I can tell you, the practice of the rule of law, the entire concept of justice, democracy – that is going to last for all eternity." Lee Con Yew cons the world In the first World Cities Summit and International Water Week forum, LKY told the audience as reported by the ST today:He (LKY) said a country needed 3 elements to succeed.First, a govt that people have confidence in and will trust when tough decisions need to be taken.Second, leaders who are above board, who make decisions based on necessity, not how they will personally benefit. He said Singaporeans know they have such leaders because, over the years, "We have not got richer, Singapore has".Third and most importantly, a country needs able men in charge...When I read the 2nd point, I was laughing like hell. Aren't our "leaders" the highest paid Govt among the first world countries? Temasek lost more than half its investment Barclays is expected to add two new sovereign wealth funds to its existing duo of China Development Bank and Singapore's Temasek, which came on board last July to help the British bank raise its - unsuccessful - bid for ABN Amro.Yet both have already lost more than half their investment, paying 720p a share for their combined 5 per cent stake compared with last week's price of around 320p.It is not Temasek's only loss: last December, it paid $4.4bn (£2.2bn) for a stake in US banking giant Merrill Lynch; last week, that holding was worth just $3.4bn. [...]Shares in Swiss banking giant UBS have halved since the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation paid 11bn Swiss francs (£5.5bn) for a 9.5 per cent stake.[source] Reform Party Inauguration Dinner Date : 11.July.2008 Friday, 1900Hr. atThe Reform Party Inauguration DinnerThe Fortunate RestaurantBlk 181, Toa Payoh Centeral2nd Level (Near National Library)@S$30 per person or @S$300 per table of 10For bookings please contact party treasurer:M/S Amy Lui h/p 83517336 Two 'Wayang' parties fight for the Singapore's Wayang-est award Workers' Party Yaw Shin Leong voted for the PAP in the last election. Now PAP has whacked WP in it's latest issue of PAP newletter, Petir. Keep up the good work Yaw! PAP raps WP for ill-timed silence and double-talkFri, Jun 20, 2008By: Li XueyingTHE People's Action Party (PAP) has criticised the Workers' Party (WP), saying it failed to make its stand clear on important issues at critical points.WP secretary-general Low Thia Khiang, it added, is often 'quick to criticise, yet offers no serious proposals'.Taking aim at the WP and the MP for Hougang - in the latest issue of the PAP newsletter Petir - was Dr Ng Eng Hen, who said: 'Singaporeans deserve more from Mr Low and the WP than silence at defining moments, or double-talk when pressed to state their stand.'In an editorial entitled Credible Opposition: Taking A Clear Stand, the PAP's organising secretary (special duties) said constructive views - even opposing ones - 'help produce better government policies and enlighten public debate' on issues.'But to simply criticise or make opportunistic snipes without offering solutions or, worse, to fudge on national issues instead of taking a clear stand, does little to raise the standard of political debate or the reputation of the Workers' Party as a responsible opposition'.Noting that Mr Low vowed at the last election to adopt a 'watchdog' role, DrNg asked what Mr Low has achieved, and pointed to two instances.One was the Parliament debate on the escape of terrorist Mas Selamat Kastari from detention.Mr Low had said he could not reconcile the fact that, while ministers' pay was pegged to that of chief executives, the ministers did not adhere to the issue of accountability practised in the private sector.Yet Mr Low was 'totally silent' when Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong asked if he thought Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng should quit.Said Dr Ng: 'His statement is baffling. What then was the point of his question to the Prime Minister? Was it just another political ploy?'Another instance was the WP May Day message asking if Singaporeans 'truly benefited' from job creation last year.PAP MP Seng Han Thong, an NTUC assistant secretary-general, asked at the time if all Hougang Town Council employees were Singaporeans. The WP said they were and added that it did not object to contractors hiring foreigners.Said Dr Ng: 'This is another cop-out. If the WP truly believes that all jobs should be reserved for Singaporeans, why does it not insist that its town-council contractors hire local workers only?'The Government, in contrast, has 'a clear stand'. While foreign workers keep the economy competitive, the Government also does its utmost to raise the skills of Singaporeans, said Dr Ng, who is now Education Minister, but previously held the Manpower portfolio.Dr Ng said Mr Low, whether in or out of Parliament, shied away from direct debate with the Government on important points.Political leaders, whether in government or not, 'need to have their own ideas, to set a direction for the country and tell Singaporeans how they intend to get there'.'Perhaps the WP sees no need to play this role as a credible opposition.'Mr Low is out of town. But WP chairman Sylvia Lim responded yesterday.She said the party's policy positions were clearly laid out in its manifesto at the 2006 General Election.Since then, the WP took on issues such as the goods and services tax hike, ministerial pay, means testing, constitutional amendments and criminal justice.On Mr Low's silence in response to PM Lee, she said: 'Benchmarking ministerial pay to corporate pay, but without corresponding corporate consequences, brings to the fore the contentious issue of whether ministers should be paid at top corporate rates. Is the comparison of minister to CEO valid?'She added that the WP is not against foreign workers.Rather, given that Singaporeans were told they had to be grateful that foreign workers saved their jobs, the WP questioned 'how far Singaporeans' social standing and prospects have been eroded... Does the PAP not know this is a real ground concern?' Brain dead Lee Kuan Yew doesn't believe in carbon-free world, calls Singaporeans 'losers' Q: But as you were watching that BBC documentary what was going through your mind about where all this is leading?LKY: I do not buy the optimistic jargon about a new age of enlightenment. But as I watched Dr. Ventner's prediction about carbon-free fuel, I say then what? You can desalinate all the oceans of the world, then what? And we will still have the overpopulation problem. My conclusion is there are certain moral and physical limits to what mankind can do on this small planet. If you begin with human history from the earliest tribes, we still haven't moved beyond instinctive responses.Q: But what you were watching also told you that anyone born today will live to be 120 and productive almost until the end, and the 22nd century will see 250 years as a normal lifespan.LKY: And then what! It makes no sense. Three score and 10 is not a bad span. Lead a good productive life and leave the future to your progeny. I fear the future for my grandchildren may not be as good as ours was. In Singapore, we now have in our physically limited space 4.5 million people, 3.2 million of them our citizens, the rest foreigners who came to work here. Our planners are projecting 6.5 million. Our planners and demographers can already see 6.5 million. I said to them, "Look, go slow. It can't be done in our small city state."Q: Nanotechnology will enable us to build skyscrapers two to three times higher.LKY: Not while I'm still around.Q: You also have a brain drain?LKY: Yes, we're losing them to America.Q: So how do you see the future of capitalism?LKY: As chairman of the equivalent of our Sovereign Wealth Fund, we examine and decide where to invest our money, in equities or bonds or what have you. Our fund managers are paid five times what I get. Why? Because they have had good track records in growing our fund and we know what they could command in the private sector. They are dealing with billions of dollars every day and must be compensated accordingly.Unbridled capitalism, winner takes all like in America, does not work unless you can cope with an underclass. So here we also stay with the losers, make sure they have enough to live on, with healthcare, equal education opportunities for their children whose parents can no longer afford it. It's very important they not feel abandoned. So we have workfare and ingenuous ways to keep them working as we don't want layabouts doing nothing. We also subsidize homes which they would not be able to buy. A society can only survive if there is a sense of equity and fair play.[Source] Why would you send your sons to NS? So many deaths. Taken from http://utopia8787.blogspot.com/2008/06/ns-is-killing-sg.html2001(from theonlinecitizen)April 06: MR Loke Ming (1WO navy) (2.4km)Oct 29: MR Kwok Wei Ming (CPL Commandos) (Training?)2002(from theonlinecitizen)Feb 25: MR Tan Kim Keng (Officer cadet OCS) (Navigation training)May 15: MR Mohd Shalan bin Abdul Rahim (LCP Reservist) (IPPT)OCT 10: MR Ivan Oh Yong Hua (REC BMTC) (Training?)2003(from theonlinecitizen, wikipedia)Jan 3: Miss Goh Hui Ling (CPL Navy) (RSS Courageous collision, death: "lodged in betweeb bunks")Jan 3: Miss Heng Sock Ling (1SG Navy) (RSS Courageous collision, death: "mutilated bodies washed up in Bintan")Jan 3: Miss Seah Ai Leng (1SG Navy) (RSS Courageous collision, death: "mutilated bodies washed up in Bintan")Jan 3: Miss Chua Bee Lin (2SG Navy) (RSS Courageous collision, assumed death: "body never found")July 21: MR Hu En Huai (2SG Commandos) (Combat Survival Training: Forced water treatment by trainers)Sept 03: MR Rajagopal Thirukumaran (2SG Commandos) (Ranger Selection Test, 5km Run, assumed irregular heartbeat)Sept 23: MR Andrew Chew Heng Huat (REC BMTC) (IPPT, assumed irregular heartbeat)2005(from theonlinecitizen)June 22: MR Tek Kok Lian (2WO, ?) (Routine run, heart attack)June 29: MR Ivan Ong Peng Ghee (3SG BMTC) (Routine run)July 14: MR Shiva s/o Mohan (1SG Commandos) (Rappelling Instructor Course, fell 20m from heli)2006Feb 1: MR Mohd Sufian Jamil (REC BMTC) (Organs failure after injection of anti-malaria)June 21: MR Lionel Lin Shi Guan (LTA Commandos) (Training at pool)Sept 18: MR Ambrose Yeo Chang Wen (PTE HQ supply and transport) (death:???)Nov 17: MR Tan Boon Toon (2WO Senior Tech at ???) (death:???)2007(from sgforum)May 11: MR Fan Yao Jin (PTE storeman) (Taiwan Plane Crash into Store)May 11: MR Isz Sazli Bin Sapari (3SG storeman) (Taiwan Plane Crash into Store)May 28: MR Calvin Chow Han Min (LCP storeman) (Taiwan Plane Crash into Store)Aug 26: MR Ho Si Qiu (OCS, died at AHM)Sep 16: MR Cheok Beng Teck (MINDEF CIO)Nov 15: MR Ricky Liu Jun Hong (CPL RSAF) (2.4km, though we're not close but he was my ex-poly classmate)June 15: MR Quek Meng Chua (Senior DXO, Treadmill) (death:???)2008(from theonlinecitizen, channelnewsasia)Feb 02: MR Tan Yit Guan (MAJ, Logistics) (Routine run, death: sudden collapse)June 10: MR Andrew Cheah Wei Siong (REC, BMTC Mild-Obese) (2km route march, death: sudden collapse)June 12: MR Lam Jia Hao (Officer Cadet/pilot trainee, Airforce) (death: sudden collapse) Yawning Bread: We shouldn't discourage SDP, they are good for freedom in Singapore The Singapore Democratic Party: method or madness?Yawning BreadEsther (not her real name) sat opposite me at lunch. Somehow, the topic of conversation got to the multiple trials involving Chee Soon Juan, Yap Keng Ho and Chee Siok Chin of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP). These were for speaking in public without a police permit, for libel against Singapore strongman Lee Kuan Yew and Prime Minister Lee Hisen Loong, and finally for contempt of court.More generally, Chee and the SDP have acquired a reputation for attempting street protests, and hurling belligerent accusations at the People's Action Party (PAP) government."I don't believe in what he is doing," Esther said, referring to Chee. "I don't think there'll ever be a substantial number of people supporting him. He'll get nowhere."I daresay she spoke for a lot of Singaporeans. In fact, if you scan through various blogs, you'll find similar opinions expressed, either disapproving of Chee's high-decibel methods or stressing the futility of such a strategy.At the last general election in 2006, the main SDP team stood in Sembawang Group Representation Constituency. They received only 23% of the vote, which from previous elections we know is roughly the irreducible fraction of the electorate that will never vote for the PAP. Mostly, that 23% vote-share represented not any love for the SDP, but visceral rejection of the government party. As one unkind soul said, even if you put a troupe of monkeys up for election, 23% would still vote for them.While looking at vote-share might have been a relevant gauge when the SDP was standing for elections, things have changed, and understanding this change is necessary for a proper measure of what they are now doing. Thus, to point out that the majority of Singaporeans will never be able to bring themselves to support them is in a large way, off the mark.Extra-parliamentary struggleThe SDP arrived at the conclusion a few years back that the PAP will never allow themselves to be defeated electorally. The rules will be rewritten as necessary, the levers of mass communication will always be used to advantage and as many people as they can entice will be co-opted (with high salaries) to deprive opposition parties of talent.I don't think anyone can prove the contrary. Certainly, none of the other opposition parties have yet made any significant inroads to even begin to cast doubt on this reading of the PAP's bottom line. In fact, I would say, at least half, if not three-quarters of Singaporeans would generally agree with this analysis.What the SDP has done is to take the analysis further. If the PAP will never allow themselves to be defeated through the electoral route, what else can be done?The answer: They have to be defeated morally. This in a nutshell is what the SDP's tactics are designed to do, and their success or failure should be measured by how much moral opprobrium sticks to the PAP.If you look at it from this angle, you find yourself conceding, grudgingly perhaps, that the SDP is not completely unsuccessful. Time and again, they bring out the worst in the PAP for everyone to see. The police overreact at Hong Lim Green. Four people standing on the sidewalk saying nothing but wearing similar T-shirts (i.e. less than the minimum five that require a police permit) are nevertheless arrested for refusing to disperse. Judges are made to look like hatchet men for the PAP and both the Attorney-General and the Law Minister have recently been provoked to say outrageous things, making themselves look quite unbecoming. Lee Kuan Yew himself is made to look the bully that he is while on the witness stand. The SDP strips the PAP of their smiling mask, and reminds us that while we may be fearful of the government party, there is no reason to love them. More, the PAP's power is maintained by a perversion and corruption of many institutions of state. In short, the SDP cast doubt on the moral legitimacy and long-term wisdom of the government.That is what the SDP has set out to do, and fair credit should be given to them for achieving it, at least to a degree (and I say "them" because it is not just Chee Soon Juan alone, but many equally dedicated confederates of his too). No doubt, they have done it at great personal cost, but instead of dismissing their efforts as pointless, I think we ought to reflect on how our views of the PAP are shaped by the SDP's determination and sacrifice, however loath we are to credit them for it.And I understand why too we are loath to give credit to them: Because of fear. Subliminally perhaps, we fear being associated with them and the risks posed to ourselves. It may even get to the point where we refuse to believe that our views of the PAP are partly shaped by the way the SDP has shown them upThe die was cast long agoThe other thing to watch out for is the tendency to treat the SDP as irrational. I see, for example, Lee Kuan Yew trying to character assassinate Chee by asserting that he fits the description of a psychopath, and as you might have noticed, the mainstream media dutifully played it up.Chee strikes me as intensely rational. While he is unusually single-minded and almost unimaginably brave -- and these traits make him not like 99.9% of us, which is rather alarming -- they do not mean he is mad.Furthermore, one can even argue that he didn't really choose this course of action, and that to a large part, Lee Kuan Yew chose it for him. The moment Lee chose, I think in 1994, to persecute him by hauling him over the coals over a taxi fare claim when Chee was still teaching at the National University of Singapore, and then attacking him relentlessly over some health care statistics in 1996, the die was cast.Lee had made up his mind that Chee must be "demolished", to use a word that Lee rather favours, and from that point on, it was only a matter of waiting for Chee to trip up, which he did -- perhaps foolishly -- in the 2001 general election. He said something defamatory during the hustings and the PAP leaders sued and bankrupted him.As a bankrupt he cannot stand for election until he is discharged, so what is he to do?The futureThe big unknown is: Where will this lead? What changes will any of this bring about? Won't the stranglehold that the PAP has on power remain as tight as ever?This feeling lies behind the "It's all so futile" opinion that we see around us.Indeed the SDP has burnt so many bridges -- it is likely to be deregistered as a result of one of the recent court cases -- that it is extremely improbable that it will ever participate in, let alone win, elections again. That being the case, one might say: Isn't that a dead-end road?But that is linear thinking, which tends to blind us to other effects and outcomes. History, in fact, has many examples of how political agitation of this kind, even without mass support, can break down a political system.In essence, to succeed the agitation has to provoke an over-reaction by the regime. It need not be a single event, but can be cumulative. Typically, the regime does not even realise that it is over-reacting; it is just acting according to its instincts or doing what it has successfully done before. But at some point, it is seen as excessive, self-serving and immoral, either by a plurality of the people, or within the elite.The rarer consequence is for people to speak out and say, "Enough. Things must change".The more common consequence, but also less headline-making, which is why most people are not even aware of such processes, is for rumblings within the elite to cause soul-searching. A few members of the elite may speak out publicly, but most will either speak privately, or act tacitly, distancing themselves from the core group of power-players. In other words, an unspoken mark-down of loyalty.Then two alternative scenarios can arise. Either a moderate faction emerges within the ruling clique and tussles for power with the hardliners thereby destabilising what had hitherto been a solid regime, or the top man himself, worried about rumblings among the elite and softening of support, decides to change course. He embarks on what my friend Russell Heng has coined "the politics of retreat".Like military retreat, political retreat too is fraught with risks. The very fact that it is ordered is a major confession that the previous position has become untenable. It blows away the aura of invincibility that leaders have come to rely on for amassing either support or acquiescence. Arguments break out over where the second line of defence ought to lie. Opponents are emboldened to demand more. Too many times in history, what is planned as an orderly retreat quickly becomes a rout. And a new political system is born.That's Chee's and the SDP's hope. And frankly, it would be churlish to deny that such an end result -- a freer, more normal political system -- is generally ours too. We may be afraid to stand with them, but at least for the sake of our own moral integrity if nothing else, we shouldn't disparage or discourage them. We are stronger day by day, Massive vigil at Queenstown Singapore Democrats The candle-light vigil for Dr Chee Soon Juan at the Queenstown Remand Prison last night ended with a difference. Departing from the normal, the more than 30 SDP members, supporters and activists sang the song "We shall overcome" with gusto as bewildered guards inside prison gates were startled and stared with a sense of loss at the group outside. But the emotionally charged number reverberated through the still night once and that prompted the "choir" to go for an encore.Dr Chee is serving 12 days in prison for a contempt-of-court offence and is expected to be released on Saturday, 14 June. Our dictator will have his end By: thinkallIt is a sign of time where sedition is used as a means to counter opposition. It is the sign of time, where it must and it will to reason the existence of a regime other than the free expression of the will of the people.It is the sign of time, when tolerance of opposition is taken as a measure of incumbent gracefulness rather a compulsion necessitated by the force of the people, the law and the time.Take heed of those many things to come where a ruler decides that he is no longer bound by the reasonable expectation of the people. All measures of positives strokes are ruled by exigencies of the quintessential political existence.Let it all roll out like a planned episode of a long epic, all dictators will end the dictator’s end, no more, no less. Dimwit Lee Hsien Loong hid behind his lawyer Singh ".....During the cross-examination of Mr Lee Hsien Loong, Dr Chee repeatedly asked him to not hide behind his lawyer and answer the questions put to him. Mr Singh objected to almost every question put to his client, questions regarding the GIC, HDB, CPF, NKF, ministers' pay and so on. Judge Ang upheld them. (A list of the questions the Prime Minister avoided to answer)“You can tell your lawyer right here and now that you want to answer my questions,” Dr Chee pointed out. The Prime Minister stole a glance at Mr Singh and remained silent.“Let me warn you Mr Lee that you and your father's moral standing to rule Singapore is at stake. I ask that you re-consider your application to impose a guillotine time,” Dr Chee added.At one point, Mr Singh, probably out of desperation, interjected: “As counsel, I made the decision!”“Without your client's approval how can you do that?” Dr Chee replied, adding that Mr Singh was putting his client in a bad light.Mr Lee Hsien Loong remained stoic and silent."http://yoursdp.org/component/content/article/1-singapore/481-lees-cut-and-run Is Mrs. Lee Kuan Yew worthy of a headline? By: ptader The chief bastard in this famiLEE of bastards showed no courtesy and had no compunction in mercilessly ruining and destroying the lives of innocent people whose only sins were to challenge his powers. The resultant sufferings and hardships brought upon the ageing mothers, young daughters and families of the lives he bankrupted, incarcerated and ruined were of no consideration nor consequence to him, the old bitch and the rest of the fucking animals in that famiLEE.Why should the young daughter and wife of Tang Liang Hong be worth less than this old fucking bitch? What about Chee Soon Juan's ageing mother? Is she not a mother to him and a grandmother to his daughters? What about his wife? Is she not somebody's daughter and a mother to his daughters?What about Chia They Poh's mother, sisters and family who were denied their son and brother for 23 years? What about JBJ's wife? Is she not worthy of consideration of being someone's wife and a mother? What about Francis Seow? What about the "Marxist conspirators" and all those whose lives he ruined simply because they wanted to challenge his powers? Did all these people not have mothers, grandmothers and sisters and were they not deserving of the courtesy you now seek for this family of bastards and animals?As this famiLEE of bastards sow, so shall they reap. And I hope the harvest of death they reap will be as torturous, painful and bitter as can be. Singapore full of retards By: bangyDo not fall for the Sterotypification of our CHEAP world class Media Label that ALL Singaporeans as Retards.Surely you are not implying you are a typical 'sinkie' or are you ?To cut the long story short, I say just support all OPPOSITION or any OPPOSITION just to cut down the percentages of the PAP.If not for the GRC system, surely we would have seen more OPPOSITION MEMBERS in parliament by now. If not for the LAWSUITS, FIXING, HATCHET SWINGING, CHANGING OF ELECTORIAL BOUNDARIES, TOTAL MEDIA DOMINATION BY THE PAP, the OPPOSITION MEMBERS would have had a good chance of seeing it grow.In the WORDS of our Blood Thirsty PM, he will have to FIX them.If the PAP cease all such PERSECUTION, you would surely see a flourishing of our OPP.IT is high time that our OPPOSITION parlimentairians to campaign for a "FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT".It is only with that, that DEMOCRACY would then be meaningful.Surely you must look for the cause to the current effect of how fear is being instilled to a huge majority of our populace. IT didn't happen overnight. 40 over years of MARGINALISATION of the OPPOSITION MEMBERS have lead it to its current state.It was a systematic, calculated plan by the ruling party to DECIMATE any OPPOSITION hopes and to narrow their span of mouting any effective challange.If we truly believe that Singaporeans are indeed apathetic and we actually believe in the DEMONISE version of our image as a people that is being pandered to us on a daily basis by the STATE TIMES, then 33.3 PERCENT of the electorate would not HAVE EVEN voted for the OPPOSITION PARTIES.And if you are waiting for the RIGHT messiah from the OPPOSITION to save us all, then perhaps you have been duly duped.WE are our own messiah. But first, we have to create the condition that would allow the OPP to develop. That is to make sure the OPPOSITION PARTIES gains a better percentage in the NEXT GE and if possible, and hopefully they would manage to BREAK the Great GRC debacle in the next GE.Its time we take responsibility of our own well being. Lee Scum Yew resorts to lawsuits in a bid to 'protect his or his government's reputation' ? By: Robox I have no idea why Lee Scum Yew needs to resort to lawsuits in a bid to 'protect his or his government's reputation'.I'm not being facetious here, but sincerely he is able to take down his own reputation, singlehandedly and unaided, by his use of rigged lawsuits against his political opponents.I actually have friends who are very, very close to the establishment, and even they say they are disgusted by these moves.But the problem for reformists is that these same disgusted people 'know' that they would have to keep voting the PAP to be able to continue earning their ill-earned privileges - or so they believe.But I say: fret not; time is on our side. As you say, respect is earned; but I would add, votes not necessarily so - especially in Singapore - because there is a very definite coercive element to vote-getting.The non-respect of those who are disgusted with the PAP but vote them anyway is something to be exploited; I don't currently know how that can be done but I'm just putting this on the table. 146th TODAY Changed Title of Gopalan Nair's news by: Uncle yapI was brought to my attention by member of public that today's 146th TODAY has 2 versions of prints, the earlier version is on the top and the later version changed the news title seen at the bottom.So they had first wanted public perception of the Mr Gopalan Nair to be American then otherwise later. Some instructions had been issued from the top to have this changed? :-) Exclusive Interview with Gopalan Nair in California It was a cold morning. The whole San Francisco bay area was covered by dense fog, like a pall of gloom, as I was driving along the highway from San Jose to Fremont. Surprisingly the traffic was not as bad as what Shitty Times would like me to believe back home, even during such severe weather condition. Visibility was only less than 100 metres at times, but most American drivers were pretty patient and cutting lanes by signalling seemed to "work" in this part of the world. My mission was to pay homage to an old freedom fighter, Gopalan Nair, who had been persecuted and fined by the PAP system in the early 90s for saying the "wrong" thing. We connected before embarking on this USA trip and were given detailed directions on how to reach his office in Fremont.The sky started to clear when I reached the destination. There was a nice public park right across this 2 storey office building in surburb settings. Greeneries, mountains and open space, all luxuries in our homeland, but seemed abundant in this part of California.I was 10 minutes early and Mr Nair was meeting a client in his office at that time. I looked around and had this strange feeling that I was transformed back home. The settings and office layout were so similar to those lawyers' offices in Singapore."You must be X," an old fatherly voice exclaimed from the background."Welcome to my humble office!" This 170cm, well built gentlemen in dark suit came forward to shake my hand and this was followed by an exchange of greetings. I was even more surprised to hear from someone who had been living in USA for the past 10 yrs to use typical Spore style ice-breakers like "I grew up in Somerset Rd Indian corners where the PUB building stands now" and "Tell me where you live in S'pore, X", etc. This place was certainly more like home than any yankee office.So this set the tone for our two-hour conversation that morning. Among which were issues he raised during his campaign period in the 88 and91 elections and the events following the court cases afterwards."It was a tough battle, not during elections, but the days after that," said this old fighter who spoke with a commanding voice. He related with disappointment on how his friends deserted him, his law business in S'pore suffered and his dignity's being diminished."You know what? I'm lucky," he said. "I have a very supportive wife!"He recalled on how his family had to depend on his wife to bring food on the table during his days of selling Worker's Party's "Hammers" on the street to spread the words of democracy more than 10 yrs ago.Without his wife's support, Nair said he would not have the stamina to continue his fight after the loss in 88 election.But during the height of the 91 election, Nair mentioned his dissatisfaction of the lack of independence of the judicary system in S'pore during an election rally. The PAP government took offence on this remark and fined him $8000 for contempt and struck off his roll."I have only two choices at that time," sighed the old fighter who had3 young toddlers at that time, "Either kow tow to PAP or find another place to make a living.""The PAP wanted to cripple me, just like what they had done to my hero JBJ," Nair said angrily. "But I'm determined not to let they enjoy seeing me & my family suffered." Armed with a law degree, Nair knew that he was in a much better position than many of his comardes at that time to find greener pesture outside S'pore."I sold off everything and with $25,000, we came here, California," he tapped on his 2 metres long teak wood office desk. I then asked about why he chose America, instead of more popular Singaporean favourites like Australia, UK or New Zealand."Each place has its merits, but I believe California is a place where for most people, a dream would come true if you are willing to work hard, regardless of your background," said this lawyer. "But let me warn you... this is also a very cruel place where only the fittest survives."This was followed by sharing of his experiences when he first stepped foot on this "Land of Opportunities", initial hiccups and how he slowly built up his business and eventually established himself in the local immigrant communities."You see those Vietnamese, Mexicans, Indians, Pakistanis, Chinese, Russians etc... Everywhere!" he pointed out from his office windows, which had a nice paranomic view of the neighbourhood. "And you know, most of them can't even speak good English and for many, none at all!""If that Vietnamese can own a petrol station right across the street,"he said. "what is the problem of S'poreans who had such a good headstart and strong foundation in terms of English education?"He leant forward, pointing to his head slowly,"It's here! Creative and independent thinking!"Sensing that the California sunshine had cleared the morning dense fog and the sun was once again embracing the land, we decided to take a walk outside."I practically live in this office," Nair laughed. I was then being told that he had devoted most of his time in his work and once he had holidays, he would fly back to S'pore to see his family and old friends."I don't understand those S'poreans here, why subject yourselves to being monitored by PAP by joining those S'porean clubs in USA," he remarked. "You can always spend US$600 to go home as & when you have time to eat your laksa and char kway teow," and he recalled an interesting encounter days ago on a heated exchange with the S'pore Consul General in San Francisco in one of those S'porean functions."Jai is a big disappointment," he shoke his head. "A shame for the PAP government to have such a representative in this land." Nair recalled how Jai-sohan, the Consul-General, took on him in a public debate because he raised an issue about overcoming that bad image of S'pore during the meeting.According to Nair, Jai-sohan challenged him to talk about human rights issues of S'pore infront of many S'porean expatriates and Americans, probably thinking that Nair was just another overseas S'porean who cared nothing much about the political scene back home. That was a wrong move and as soon as Jai sensed his foolishness, he quickly wanted to call an end of the debate & even claimed that Dr Chee Soon Juan "deserved all these" because "he broke the law" by asking that kind of question during election. It was a clear indication of the presence of PAP affiliation with such sensitive topics being discussed in PAP lingo at such event.Noting that many Spore government missions of "persuading overseas S'poreans to return home" had been closed down recently, Nair pointed out that Sporean folks who wanted to escape that political stiffening place would never want to be subjected to another PAP brainwashing or organisation again. "Having people like Jai-sohan to do MARKETING is certainly a big turn off for many."As we walked, Nair recounted his happy days of being a Worker's Party's member and the days of having the company of his old comrades.He never failed to express his outmost respect for JBJ and great respect for LTK at every chance."Ben is a gentleman," sighed Nair. "He played by the dirty rules set out by PAP and I'm sure history would be kind to him."Asked about if he still kept in contact with the present WP's leadership, Nair shook his head. "Many of those old guards are no more there, many many unsung heores like that bike shop owner in Toa Payoh and those ex-Barisan guys. They put their hearts and souls for the country. I respect them."As for other oppositions, Nair seemed not to have much knowledge excpet CSJ."I went to CSJ's court hearings, you know?" he clunched his fist while we were walking along the busy street. "It's a total sham. How can the judge do such things to a guy who is not trained in law at all?"We came to a restaurant in a Mall and Nair was stopped by one of his clients whose kid had run into legal problem. I excused myself and saw from a distance his client's eyes filled with tears while he's holding Nair's hands."You see, it's all about long term relationship and trust," said Nair as we sat down in a restaurant. "People know you can do the job and what is more satisfying than helping others while earning a living of being a lawyer at the same time?"We had a decent lunch and as we ate, Nair never stopped asking about the current political and social situation in S'pore. He had a strong interest of his motherland and he also shared with me his impression on S'pore from afar.Asked about what he felt about the future of S'pore. "S'poreans are going to be extinct," he sighed. "Somewhat like some middle east countries where only 10% of the populations are locals while 90% are made up with foreigners who are there to make a living."Unfortunately, not many S'poreans can live like those oil shieks in the middle east."If you are not connected," said Nair, "Don't expect to live like what a normal American does." Nair pointed out that despite all odds against new immigrants, USA still attracted all the talents in the world while not many real talents wanted to take root in S'pore. "If these foreign talents see how S'pore government treat their own citizens, would they want to subject themselves and their children to the same?"Nair further illustrated that point on how his clients, who were immigrants, had no problem amassing US$1-2 million in their working lifetime and will eventually retire happily in Asia, while many of S'pore lawyer friends were still barely surviving under the PAP system.At the end of the two-hour session, I was able to get an insight into the man's political reasoning behind some of the current issues and understanding his post election endeavours from a veteran's viewpoint, something which Shitty Times can never provide.Nair had been in USA for over ten years now. He remained a cheerful person full of humour at mid-50s. But somehow the sadness of not being able to fight for the underdogs back at home and lines of weariness from years of hardwork were beginning to show in his face.Does it also mean that fighting against PAP is a deadend unless one is willing to play some nice guy opposition character in local politics?But the saddest part is that the whole political process has resulted many ordinary "unconnected" Singaporeans only making a decent living outside his motherland. No one should be deprived of chances to develop his fullest potential at own country. Not if the PM says that every Singaporean matters. Scum Lee Kuan Yew paid Justice Ang millions If they were any lingering doubts that the media were the propaganda-wing of the PAP, the news "reports" of the assessment of damages hearing removed them.Through selective reporting, accompanied by "politically correct" photographs and sketches it was clear that there was one and only one objective - to make the Lees appear hero-like.It must be gratifying - and comforting, or course - for our leaders to know that what the say and do will be washed, bleached and perfumed for public consumption.Unwitting Singaporeans get this glorified image punched into their mindsets and are lulled into a dangerous state of political torpor. Our leaders develop a weakness of the mind.This is where the danger lies.But for all his cleverness, Mr Lee Kuan Yew cannot see this danger (assuming that that is what concerns him in the first place).But that's another discussion for another day.For now, it is important to note how the coverage has completely ignored reality. With headlines like "Typical Chee – he changes story when caught out" and "SDP chief's version 'at odds with the facts'" the intent was obvious - portray the Lees as statesmen and Dr Chee as the villain.Little or no coverage was given to the many exchanges between Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Dr Chee. This would be political blasphemy. How can the MM be confronted with questions that assailed his integrity? And worse, made to answer to the opposition? Dr Chee: He (Mr Lee Kuan Yew) is talking about his integrity. Is this the same integrity that you are referring to when your government in 1963 arrested all your political opponents under Operation Coldstore? Mr Davinder Singh, counsel for the plaintiffs, rises to object. Dr Chee (turning to Mr Singh): Let him answer, he wants to answer. Judge Belinda Ang: Question is disallowed. Mr Singh: Thank you, Your Honour. Dr Chee: He wants to talk about integrity and I want to talk about integrity. Let's talk about integrity, Mr Lee. Is this the same integrity as you are referring to when you jailed Mr Chia Thye Poh for 32 years, when you imprisoned Dr Lim Hock Siew for 19 years, and when depriving them all – Judge Ang: Question is disallowed. Mr Lee Kuan Yew: May I point out to you what Singapore was when I became prime minister in 1959 and what Singapore is now. We had less than $100 million in the kitty. Now that the assets that we have and I am not disclosing this but Global Financial Services assessed Singapore's sovereign wealth fund at over $300 billion. Dr Chee: I am impressed. Now – Mr Lee Kuan Yew: If you are impressed, Mr Chee – Dr Chee, if you're impressed, you would not have made these allegations. Dr Chee: Mr Lee, is this the same integrity where you're talking about declassified documents from London? Judge Ang: Irrelevant. Dr Chee: – that you have – Judge Ang: The witness is not required to answer. Dr Chee: And I would like – well, Your Honour, he's brought up integrity and I just want to be able to pursue that line just a little bit more. Is it the same integrity – Mr Singh: Your Honour, I object to this line of questioning. Dr Chee: That you are referring to, Mr Lee, where now we begin to know – Justice Ang: Question is disallowed. Dr Chee: – and as a young man, I didn't – I believed you but now I'm reading declassified documents from London saying that somehow – Mr Singh: Your Honour – Dr Chee: – somehow, Mr Lim Chin Siong – Mr Singh: Your Honour, please stop him. Dr Chee: – was in his – Judge Ang: Dr Chee Dr Chee: Was in his political situation, and that somehow – Judge Ang: Your question is disallowed. Dr Chee: – you had – I beg your pardon, Your Honour? Justice Ang: The question is disallowed. How is this relevant to the assessment of damages? Dr Chee: You haven't even heard my question yet. You haven't even heard my question. Let me ask the question and then you can disallow it, Your Honour.Mr Lee remained quiet.What happened to his earlier bravado that he would be ready to answer any question not only on this suit but also on his life? Not a word of this in the newspapers.This is not the first time that such nonsense has taken place. Past instances involving the SDP also received such dishonest media treatment. The difference now is that we have the Internet.The problem, however, is that the reach of cyberspace is limited compared to the mainstream press. To this extent, the PAP still has the upper hand. Hopefully, this will change.This website will continue to reveal the exchanges that went on in the courtroom over the next few days. Be sure to check back. Scum Lees not aware of the NKF scandal During cross-examination of Mr Lee Hsien Loong, Mr Davinder Singh repeated objected to the questions. And yet the hearing was to assess the plaintiffs' reputations so that damages could be decided.And yet everytime the questions about the Lees' reputations were raised, Mr Singh objected. And yet none of what Dr Chee tried to ask was reported in the press. Chee (to Lee Hsien Loong): Would you refer to pg 192 of your AEIC, para 3 and read it to us. Mr Lee Hsien Loong starts reading. Just before he gets to the words he uttered about fixing the opposition and buying over his supporters, Mr Davinder Singh stands up. Singh: Objection, Your Honour. Judge: I'll read it. Chee: Mr Lee, you read it. Judge: Dr Chee please tell us the relevance. Chee: This paragraph will show it's true of him - Judge Move on, the question is disallowed. Chee: He has used words like "fix" and "buy votes". He's here to tell me that his reputation is based on so much. I'm here to demolish it, when he buys votes - Judge: Disallowed. Chee: Let it be recorded then. Mr Lee, come out and don't hide behind your counsel. You have every opportunity to answer the questions. You allow your counsel to cover - Singh: Objection, Your Honour. Judge: Court has taken note of Dr Chee's conduct. Chee: Mr Lee, please refer to pg 39 of your AEIC sub-heading "lack of transparency." Do you agree with the last line and last paragraph that the GIC operates in secrecy? Singh: Objection. Dr Chee is seeking to reopen the issue. This article relates to the offending words. The meaning has been taken to be false. The question of liability is done. Chee: Turn then to pg 75 of your AEIC, bottom of the page. Is the Government transparent? Do you agree with this statement? Singh: I object. Judge: Irrelevent. Chee: Do you believe the funds belongs to the people? Singh: Irrelevent. Chee: Same line and reason, that he is the Prime Minister and takes pride in the integrity - Singh: The question is on the matter of Assesment of Damages - Judge: Move on, Dr Chee. Chee: You are the Deputy or the Vice Chairman of the GIC? Singh: Irrelevant. Chee: I want to establish that he says his reputation is sterling - Singh: My client didn't say that. Judge: Yes. Chee: How and where you have invested the GIC funds? Judge: Move on. Chee: Were you aware of the scandal at NKF - Singh: Relevancy? NKF is a matter of liability. Judge: Dr Chee, irrelevant. Chee: Then you agree that T T Durai's salary was excessive? Singh: Objection. Judge: Sustained. Chee: Do you agree the salary - Singh: Your Honour, my client was not aware of the NKF scandal - Judge: Irrelevant. Chee: If T T Durai had a summary judgement - Singh: Objection. Judge: Sustained. Chee: Do you agree that the openness of the Government - Singh: Objection. Judge: Sustained. Chee: I disagree as the witness was a Prime Minister during the period and argued in Parliament - Singh: Maybe the Health Ministry was misled and my client did not know. The Government did proceed to investigate the matter. Chee: The Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Health made comments and continued leading the people to donate to the NKF. You were the Prime Minister - Singh: Objection. Chee: Did you know the warning signals - Singh: Objection. Chee: These were raised in Parliament and whether he was sleeping like some of his colleagues - Singh: That is not necessary and insulting - Judge: Dr Chee, move on. Singh: I want to remind Dr Chee of the injunction against repeating - Chee: Do you agree if the salary is too much? Judge: Disallowed. Chee: Do you think that your Ministers spend too much - Judge: Disallowed. Chee: I put to you that the PAP is bent on greed and power. Singh Objection. Judge: Sustained. Chee Refer to pg 9 of your AEIC. Is the information on the cost of labour of building HDB flats available? Singh: Objection. Judge Sustained. Chee: Is information on the cost of material of building HDB flats available? Singh: Objection. Judge Sustained. Chee: Do you agree that the HDB is operating in secrecy? Singh: Objection. Judge Sustained. Gopalan to Lees: Come & sue me! This is Gopalan Nair in Singapore today, May 29, 2008. I have been in Singapore since May 25, 2008, and staying now at Broadway Hotel, Room 708, 195 Serangoon Road, Singapore 218067.I am deliberately stating my identity and my present exact location for a definite purpose. On day 2 of the trial in Singapore, day before yesterday, in the Lee Kuan Yew and son verses Dr. Chee Soon Juan case, Lee senior had said in answer to a question by Dr. Chee, that if he, Lee Kuan Yew, knew the identity of bloggers in cyberspace who defamed him (defamation being used of course in the Singaporean sense), he will sue and bankrupt them.He had earlier sidestepped the question by saying, that he had difficulty suing critics of his in the Internet because their identities were not usually known. When pressed, he categorically and deliberately stated that he will sue if they made known their identities.Well, what you are going to read should be without question defamatory of Mr. Lee and his son, that is in the warped and hare brained Alice in Wonderland meaning of the word "defamation". It will be interesting to see if this Singapore strongman, Lee Kuan Yew and son, who strut around the small island of Singapore bullying everyone who so much as criticized, will sue me now for calling him nothing more than a small time street bully; since now, we have myself Gopalan Nair who has the temerity to identify himself and state his presence with full address in Singapore.Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, see here. I am now within the jurisdiction of your courts; I repeat, "the jurisdiction of your courts" because literally they are your courts, willing to commit any crime or injustice you will demand of them.During the last 3 days of the court hearing, up till yesterday, in the High Court, before your stooge of a judge, Belinda Ang in Court 4, you and your Prime Minister son conducted yourselves as expected, no better than cowards hiding behind the coat tails of your equally cowardly counsel doubling up as a PAP politician in court; who managed with the full co-operation of the said judge to ensure that you came to court merely for form, refusing to answer almost all questions that went directly to your integrity or rather the lack of it.After the end of the 3 days in court, it left no doubt in my mind that you and your son are indeed what international human rights organizations say you are, nothing more than tin pot tyrants who remain in power by abusing the courts to eliminate your political opponents. You are clearly corrupt, as is your government, because paying yourself $3.7 million is corruption pure and simple and in the end you have lost all credibility and moral authority to govern Singapore.The following transpired during the last 3 days in court. The judge Belinda Ang was throughout prostituting herself during the entire proceedings, by being nothing more than an employee of Mr. Lee Kuan Yew and his son and carrying out their orders. There was murder, the rule of law being the repeated victim.The issue in the said court was the determination of the quantum of damages payable by the innocent victim, Dr. Chee Soon Juan who had earlier been found liable by this judge for defamation of character of Mr. Lee and son, where the law was once again abused through the contrivance of a process known as summary proceedings, thereby disallowing Dr. Chee to produce any witnesses or to cross-examine those of Mr. Lee because there were none.The said 3 day of hearing before the court was nothing more than a mockery of justice; a charade, a make believe that appeared right out of the pages of Alice in Wonderland with Belinda Ang playing the role of the Queen of Hearts before the trial of the Mouse who stole the Tarts very well indeed. It almost appeared that she was going to dispense with all testimony and come straight to the verdict of guilty so as not to waste her valuable time!It would be fair to say, in fact an understatement, that in effect she disallowed Dr. Chee any effective cross examination of either the father Lee Kuan Yew or the son, as Mr. Singh, their counsel was almost having a workout like in a gym; standing up to object, and sitting down after almost each and every question that Dr. Chee put to his father and son clients. In fact Singh was popping up and down almost without let up during the several hours of the hearing so much so, that someone suggested to me that it would have been a good idea if he remained standing throughout the case to facilitate his expected objections at each and every question of Dr. Chee.If Dr. Chee did manage to ask even one question, it was because he went ahead and asked it despite the objection of both Mr. Singh and the judge because if he did not, he would not have been able to ask any questions at all!Dr. Chee has asked Lee's son how much he was being paid, that is $3.7 million, 6 times what George Bush is paid! Question disallowed and the son shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks whether it is just for him to corruptly steal this amount of taxpayer's money while the poor in the 1 room flats starve without any financial assistance! Question disallowed and the son shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks why the GIC and HDB function under a shroud of secrecy without any transparency, when the moneys in them is taxpayers money? Question disallowed and the son shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks whether he knew that those who read the Internet overwhelmingly hated him as a tyrant and a bully and the only ones singing praises in his name are the Singapore state owned and controlled media? Question disallowed and the son shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks whether the international community looks at him no better than a despot and a father's son? Question disallowed and the son shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee had asked this Lee Kuan Yew's son why he said in the 2006 elections that " if there were more opposition candidates at elections, he will have to "fix" them and bribe his voters to win elections"? Question disallowed and the son shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.There were many more questions put to him just as the above questions, all very relevant, which, had they been answered, would have shown that he had no integrity or reputation whatsoever, and since integrity and reputation are the issues in deciding quantum of damages, Lee Kuan Yew's son should have been awarded no damages at all; that is provided we have an independent judiciary, which we have not.Any honest spectator in the court's gallery would have come away with one opinion alone, that is, this man is Prime Minister only because he happens to be the son of his father. If he really wanted to show that he was in fact in control, he could have easily told his lawyer to stop being the Jack in the Box and stop popping up and down with his objections and let him handle the questions. At each question, he was looking meekly at his counsel to see whether he has to answer it. If I could put it in a simple way, he was nothing more than a helpless boy.The following refer to Lee Kuan Yew's testimony or rather the lack of it.Chee asked him whether he came to power through unfair means in 1959, as shown by declassified British Colonial Office documents in London? Question disallowed and the father shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks about his throwing Lim Chin Siong, his political compatriot, in jail under the ISA in solitary confinement for several years in the 1960s and whether this was a sign of a man with a reputation and integrity? Question disallowed and the father shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks about the Operation Cold Store in the 1960s where he jails political opponents because he fears he might be overthrown? Question disallowed and the father shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks about Chia Thye Poh, Zaid Zakaharia and Lim Hock Siew, his political opponents whom he imprisons without cause for many many years? Question disallowed and the father shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Chee asks whether the only people who have a good opinion of him are his state owned and controlled Singapore press, whereas everyone else in Singapore as well as the entire list of respectable foreign organizations and countries including the entire European Union consider him as a thug and small time street bully? Question disallowed and the father shamefully just sits there, protected by his counsel Mr. Singh and the kangaroo judge.Other than the dubious Transparency International Kula Lumpur Chapter (not to be confused with Transparency International of Berlin Germany) he was asked whether anyone else considered him in high regard other than the local press which he controls? His answer was that PERC and a Swiss organization, both of whom cater for businessmen thought highly of him. But when asked whether highly respected Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Lawyers Without Borders, Reporters without Borders, ILRW and several other international bodies considered him a crook; he had nothing to say, because as usual the Jack Rabbit Davinder Singh stood up once again to object and the judge obediently sustained the objection.Then Lee Kuan Yew went on to insult Dr. Chee with impunity, that he is a liar, a cheat a charlatan, a criminal and what not. Of course the judge permitted these insults, since after all Lee Kuan Yew and his son owned the courts and the judge as well.These court proceeding were nothing more than a sham, a charade and a mockery of justice. It was very clear that both father and son had no integrity or credibility whatsoever. They were ruling Singapore through fear and those who are able to leave the country leave it in droves, only to be replaced by Mandarin speaking immigrants from the Peoples Republic of China who speak no English at all.If there was one result of these proceedings it was this. Dr. Chee' impeccable reputation was vindicated. He came out of these proceedings truly as the statesman that he is, and he demolished these two petty thugs Lee and his son, perhaps not in this Singapore kangaroo court, but truly in the court of truth and conscience.And in fact despite the objection of Mr. Singh and Belinda Ang, Dr. Chee Soon Juan did manage to say to both father and son, that regardless of what the court decides, in the court of natural justice, in the court of truth and in the court of moral conscience, they had that day lost all moral authority to govern Singapore.I believe, not only me, but every single person who walked away from that courthouse yesterday came away with that same judgment.As the Lees know, I am a lawyer practicing in Fremont California and a member of the California Bar. My question to Lee Kuan Yew and his son is this. Are you going to stand by your threat and sue me for defamation as well? I am presently physically within your jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of your kangaroo courts. Are you going to going to send your process server to me with your writ of summons? Or are you, as expected, all talk and no action, when you meet those not afraid of you, just as how a petty street thug would behave? New Lee Kuan Yew movie confirms he will most likely burn in hell A 45 minute documentary on Lee Kuan Yew, the founding father of modern Singapore and one of the world's remaining strongman. The film was seized by Government officials when it premiered at a private screening on 17th May 2008. Directed by Seelan Palay.http://one-nation-under-lee.org/ One Nation Under Lee A 45 minute documentary on Lee Kuan Yew, the founding father of modern Singapore and one of the world's remaining strongman. The film was seized by Government officials when it premiered at a private screening on 17th May 2008. Directed by Seelan Palay.http://one-nation-under-lee.org/